Election Rhetoric: Analyst says 2026 vote is not uniquely fateful
Danny Kushmaro argues that labeling every Israeli election as the most important in history undermines democratic norms and makes losing harder to accept.
By Chioma Kim ·

Danny Kushmaro calls the upcoming elections the most fateful in Israel's history every night on his show. He is not the only one using that language. The phrase "Israel's most important elections" has become a standard refrain of the current campaign.
Kushmaro warns against romanticizing past eras. He argues that voters should not assume the current vote is more critical than any before it. He describes that assumption as unwise. Every election feels decisive to the participants at the time, but perspective is required to understand the broader context.
The label "fateful" changes the nature of political competition. It turns a battle between pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu blocs into an existential war. When an election is framed as the most important ever, defeat sounds like a national crisis rather than a setback. This makes it harder for the losing side to accept the outcome and try again later.
This pattern has been visible since Naftali Bennett formed his government in 2021. The country struggled with whether the losing side would allow the other side to govern. Before Bennett was sworn in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the formation of his rival government "the greatest election fraud." Netanyahu meant broken promises, not stolen ballots, but the message suggested the new government was illegitimate.
The opposition worked to bring down Bennett's government immediately. They focused on the Knesset, where the coalition's slim majority made every vote vital. In May 2022, Likud MK Miri Regev defended voting against measures that benefited soldiers and vulnerable groups. She stated that the main goal was to topple the coalition. The government spent much of its short life fighting for survival.
Benjamin Netanyahu won the 2022 election and formed a hard-right government. Yair Lapid conceded the defeat and arranged an orderly handover. However, language of illegitimacy returned as opposition to the judicial overhaul grew. In April 2023, former Shin Bet director Yuval Diskin told a large crowd in Tel Aviv that the government was morally illegitimate despite being elected legally. He cited its "appalling composition and reprehensible actions."
Kushmaro argues that this cycle of declaring each vote as historically unique risks undermining trust in the process. The 2026 vote follows this established pattern of rhetorical escalation.
Source: The Jerusalem Post
More Politics · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?





